Skip to content

“Every man’s memory is his private literature”

Goya's Collossus

McGill University is joining the ranks of educational institutions that are digitizing their rare book collections for mass consumption (via Rare Book News).

On the whole I tend to see these projects as a positive move towards making antiquarian and obscure scholarship available to a much larger group than might otherwise be able to make use of these things.

I did a brief stint in the early 1990s at a Canadian federal government department, which shall remain nameless, doing technical support. This was at a time when the web was just hitting our collective radar as the emergent phenomenon of the still geek-ghetto Internet.

I was frankly shocked at the number of people I met who had spent fifteen to twenty years laboriously producing quite good research on both Canadian and international topics, for reports that sat on a shelf in the same building in which they were produced—and never actually read by anyone else beyond an approving manager. Although all of these reports were theoretically available to the public, who the hell was ever going to find them?

The web completely revolutionized the mission of this department and they now maintain one of the best Canadian government sites, which is loaded with good to excellent research, data and summary reports that the general public can actually benefit from.

So, I’m generally pro digitization.

Except this year I read the amazing Vernor Vinge’s Hugo award winning Rainbows End. (“Amazing Vernor Vinge” makes him sound like some kind of magician…which he is in a way.) This wonderful post-cyberpunk, techno-thriller novel contains the bibliophiles’ worst nightmare: a book scanning device that shreds book, shelf and all—like a demonic wood chipper—as it absorbs the contents (or most of them anyway) of the text.

Now I wake up in the middle of the night with afterimages of a scaly, slavering giant named Google chomping and belching his way through my private dream library.

“Go West, young man, and grow up with the country”

The Guardian’s Clive Sinclair has posted a great top-10 list of westerns.

Until last year, the western was a genre blind spot for me. I had never really considered the western. I was dimly aware of my grandfather having had a large collection of Louis L’Amour paperbacks, but I hadn’t read any. Last year though, I read Lonesome Dove on a friend’s recommendation, with considerable trepidation—based primarily on the incredibly cheesy cover painting.

I’ve seen Lonesome Dove sneered at in some hipper-than-thou quarters, but to my mind it thoroughly deserved its 1985 Pulitzer Prize. On the surface it seems like a fairly straightforward western in the “oater” tradition, but the real power of the book creeps up on you slowly.

At first, you’re lulled by McMurtry’s ability to convey the rich interior lives of all his characters through solid, but economical prose. Even Festus-like minor characters as presented fully realized individuals. McMurtry is so convincing that, fifty pages in, you find yourself completely invested in these yokels and their hopes and dreams.

It’s at this point that you realize that McMurtry doesn’t have your best interests at heart.

Not many writers are capable of treating lovingly rendered characters as mercilessly as McMurtry. Nor are many genre writers as resolutely determined to subvert your expectations in such carefully realistic ways. Give Lonesome Dove a fair chance and I guarantee you’ll be surprised.

Larry McMurtry is in the news these days for the release of a wonderful memoir of his 50 years in the used book trade. McMurtry still owns what is arguably the largest used book store in the U.S. Booked Up of Archer City Texas. McMurtry actually rescued his dusty Texan hometown from obscurity by turning it into a destination for book lovers—a book town. My sister has visited McMutry’s book Mecca and brought back great tales of its laid-back allure.

“Timbuktu. The far of which there is no farther.”

Timbuktu

Long synonymous in the West for the middle-of-nowhere, Timbuktu has a fascinating history as a crossroads where Malinke, Berber, Islamic, and French cultures met, mingled and clashed since before the Middle Ages. A recent article in Der Spiegel (via Bookninja) describes efforts to preserve “an enchanted Aladdin’s Cave” of thousands of manuscripts and documents representing centuries of Timbuktu’s socio-political history.

The article above is well worth a read, but it also made me think of a band I’ve been listening to recently that I want to share with you: Tinariwen.

Tinariwen are a group made up of Tuareg nomads from the Timbuktu area who got together in Gaddafi’s training camps in Libya. Leaving politics aside completely, Tinariwen look like they just stepped out of the desert:

Tinariwen

But what they play is unquestionably rock and roll. It sounds like blues from beyond time, but their music is completely accessible to Western listeners. A friend of mine described it as “ur-blues” and I think that’s as good a label as any. There’s something primal about Tinariwen’s sound that transcends cultural or genre barriers, but there is nothing coy or affected about their music.

Tinariwen’s sound is a perfect analogy for the crossroads nature of Timbuktu itself.

“I am big. It’s the pictures that got small.”

There are many examples online of stories about “things found in books“. It’s a particularly appealing topic for booksellers, because of the added interest of a kind of lottery fever. For example, we once considered purchasing a large lot of books from an ex-seller who tried to sweeten the deal by talking about the crisp $50 bill he had found in one of the piles of unsorted books he had for sale. We ultimately passed.

In keeping with more prosaic finds, I wanted to share a newspaper clipping I recently found in an Updike reprint.

The Lively Arts 

It’s a clipping of a film review from the “lively arts” section of the Montreal Gazette, circa 1966.

Gazette, 1966

The film in question is “The Serpent“, a Swedish film directed by Hans Ambramson—and despite being a onetime film school nerd, I’ve never heard of it. (Anyone who wants to leap in to claim that “Ormen” is some kind of masterpiece, feel free in the comments. For that matter, please feel free to tell me if it’s terrible.)

I’m captivated by author, Jacob Siskind’s impassioned defence of The Serpent against censors who had banned the film in Montreal. Apparently the sticking point is a scene of attempted rape that contains nothing more lascivious than “…the petting sequences in the Hollywood beach films.”

The Serpent's kiss 

Not having seen the film, I’m loath to fully agree with Siskind, but he seems to make a solid point, despite the use of the word “petting”. I’m congenitally opposed to censorship in most cases anyway. However, another thing that gave me pause about this clipping was the section of ads still attached.

movie ads 

The three films listed: Is Paris Burning?, Doctor Zhivago and Sound of Music are all now (rightly or wrongly) considered classic films. Did Siskind see these films as exceptional or did he revile them as commercial dross?

What commercial product in today’s multiplexes might be considered classic thirty years from now? And what art house films will be completely forgotten?

“He had no longer any need for home, for he carried his Gormenghast within him.”

Mervyn Peake self-portrait

Back at the end of February, I wrote briefly about the influential Mervyn Peake and his novels, poetry and art.

Enter the Octopus recently posted a wonderful excerpt of a new book by the perhaps equally influential Michael Moorcock entitled LOVERS: Mervyn and Maeve Peake. A personal memoir.

I love the unabashedly hero-worshipful tone of Moorcock’s work here: “Mervyn was dramatically handsome and his wife Maeve was dramatically beautiful.” And here: “…Mervyn and Maeve Peake were conventionally English in their formality while being unselfconscious romantics to the core. They did not posture. They did not cultivate the grotesque or the bizarre, though Mervyn might be attracted to eccentric-looking subjects. They were not burdened, as some of their contemporaries like Dylan Thomas were. They got on better with the self-effacing Graham Greene than the flamboyant Quentin Crisp.”

Moorcock paints a vivid picture of the bohemian gatherings of the Peake’s, while setting them above the fray. They are obviously the only people at the party you’d really want to know. I’m hooked on this memoir in one page. 

Also interesting, at the bottom of this post I found an automatically generated link to a separate piece on Crowley contemporary and automatic art proponent Austin Osman Spare, who, like Peake, was a War Artist. I’m fascinated by war artists and think Spare’s “Dressing the Wounded during a Gas Attack” is one of the most harrowing examples of the art. There is something incredibly surreal in having a bunch of artists running around during the thick of battle capturing sketches of the mayhem for later paintings—particularly in eras when the camera existed. But there is an undeniable power to some of the work of the war artists. The best of them, like Peake and Spare, captured some essential human horror that escapes the camera’s ability.

And, of course, their war-time experiences permeated their later art.

“I cannot determinedly enjoy myself for a whole week at a time.”

breathtaking

The better-half and I have just returned from a much needed, if brief, vacation to Ohio and upstate New York. I don’t really have anything book-related to share—I did some scouting, but came up empty-handed—I’m just looking for an excuse to share the photo above. This picture was taken from the hotel room we stayed in one night in Niagara Falls. Our toes can be seen on the foot-stool in front of the enormous picture window that virtually filled one wall of the room.

I had been to Niagara Falls many times before but had never seen them like this. From above, it’s a little easier to picture what the falls might have been like before the barnacle-like encrustations of the tourist trade.

The first Europeans to see the falls might have been Samuel de Champlain’s party as early as 1604. They were welcomed by a neutral Iroquoian nation known as the Attawandaron (a Huron name) who are virtually lost to history now. Their name for themselves is as lost as ownership of the Niagara region. You can’t look too critically at anything to do with Niagara Falls without some sense of loss.

But imagine what those early, urban-raised Europeans would have experienced: hearing the roar miles ahead and then feeling the spray as you get closer, coming through the bush to see the great walls of water dropping away beneath their feet or looming-up above their heads. Awe inspiring.

Ohio was very pretty too.

“…there’s something inside, but whatever it is, it isn’t liquor…”

De Mille book cover

Over a month ago, this story surfaced about the reprinting of an early science fiction novella, which previously only existed in two volumes in two different libraries. The Great Romance, written by an anonymous author using the pseudonym “The Inhabitant”, is thought to be the earliest known book to describe space exploration in terms of the colonization of other worlds. It apparently even deals with the now prosaic challenges of space travel such as shuttles, space suits and air-locks. And while it is perhaps not a thrilling read, these kinds of early utopian and scientific romance works are occasionally very interesting in terms of the influence they may have had over other writers.

According to academic Dominic Alessio: “In the history of SF The Great Romance appears to form an important bridge between Bellamy’s To Whom this May Come and another noteworthy and influential SF work of the late nineteenth century, namely The Coming Race, which was written in 1871 by the British novelist, dramatist, politician and statesman Edward Bulwer-Lytton.”

This story reminded me of an interesting novel that is an example of the opposite kind of forgotten classic: a work that anticipated the work of other better-known writers. A Strange Manuscript Found in a Copper Cylinder written by James De Mille—a Canadian author from the Maritimes—was only published posthumously. Had it been printed when it was written, De Mille’s novel would have been one of the earliest Victorian-era “lost world” novels. The important difference between De Mille’s work and the works of Haggard or Conan Doyle being the cutting Swiftian satire of De Mille’s hidden world.

Not to get all nationalistic, but it’s probably not a coincidence that both of these “lost” classics were written in former colonies.

“I know every book of mine by its smell…”

There’s an entertaining meme going around that was promulgated by Idoaltor, which has to do with listing your favourite albums for every year you’ve been alive. It seems natural to me to apply this concept to books. So natural in fact that I’m sure it’s already been done somewhere in the postmodern stew that is the online world, but I haven’t seen it anywhere yet.

This exercise was both easier and more difficult than I expected. Wikipedia provides some decent lists of books published by year, but too many of the usual suspects reappear. I’ve tried to augment Wiki with some general searching, which helped somewhat. The only rule I’ve abided by is to settle on one book per year, despite numerous choices.

In the end, we’re not striving for any kind of holistic accuracy; we’re just killing time and starting some conversation, right? In that spirit, I present my list of favourite books from each year since my birth:

  • 1969: Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut
  • 1970: Fifth Business, Robertson Davies
  • 1971: The Lathe of Heaven, Ursula K. LeGuin
  • 1972: Invisible Cities, Italo Calvino
  • 1973: Gravity’s Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
  • 1974: The Dispossessed, Ursula K. LeGuin
  • 1975: Salem’s Lot, Stephen King
  • 1976: Deus Irae, Philip K. Dick and Roger Zelazny
  • 1977: The Wars, Timothy Findley
  • 1978: 1985, Anthony Burgess
  • 1979: The Book of Laughter and Forgetting, Milan Kundera
  • 1980: Earthly Powers, Anthony Burgess
  • 1981: God Emperor of Dune, Frank Herbert
  • 1982: Fevre Dream, George R. R. Martin
  • 1983: The Armageddon Rag, George R.R. Martin
  • 1984: Neuromancer, William Gibson
  • 1985: Lonesome Dove, Larry McMurtry
  • 1986: A Perfect Spy, John le Carré
  • 1987: Consider Phlebas, Iain M. Banks
  • 1988: Foucault’s Pendulum, Umberto Eco
  • 1989: Hyperion, Dan Simmons
  • 1990: Use of Weapons, Iain M. Banks
  • 1991: Generation X, Douglas Coupland
  • 1992: Snow Crash, Neal Stephenson
  • 1993: The Blue Afternoon, William Boyd
  • 1994: Heavy Weather, Bruce Sterling
  • 1995: The Diamond Age, Neal Stephenson
  • 1996: Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, John Berendt
  • 1997: The Perfect Storm, Sebastian Junger
  • 1998: Girlfriend in a Coma, Douglas Coupland
  • 1999: Cryptonomicon, Neal Stephenson
  • 2000: A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, Dave Eggers
  • 2001: The Corrections, Jonathan Franzen
  • 2002: Atonement, Ian McEwan (lesser of 2 evils)
  • 2003: Pattern Recognition, William Gibson
  • 2004: The Algebraist, Iain M. Banks
  • 2005: Accelerando, Charles Stross
  • 2006: The Road, Cormac McCarthy
  • 2007: The Yiddish Policeman’s Union, Michael Chabon

The things I’ve learned through this exercise: I haven’t read any of the good books from 1997; when forced to choose, I pick “Atonement” over “You Shall Know Our Velocity” even though I hated them both; I like Douglas Coupland more than I realized; and a few of my all-time favourites were published after my birth (I expected it to lean more heavily the other way). Good fun.

“Summer has set in with its usual severity”

Poe

I’ve started and deleted this post three times now. Summer has finally descended on my hometown of Ottawa in the form of a miasma of heat and humidity that has resulted in what seems like forty days and forty nights of mist, drizzle, rain, hail, thunder and lightning. I feel like I’ve been startled awake in some decaying tropical locale instead of the second coldest capital city in the world. In honour of this lovely time of year, I had thought to provide a compilation of links to “summer reading” lists from various sources. Each post has seemed so boring they haven’t made it through the draft stage.

Inspiration has thankfully finally arrived in the form of an announcement from the excellent and highly recommended Bytown Bookshop of a Summer Mystery Sale.

Mystery is a genre I rarely comment on as I am not as widely read or appreciative of the form as many of you out there. It’s not even a speciality of the shop, even though my Sister is something of a mystery fan. I can appreciate a good mystery when I read it, but I’ve always found the genre to be so codified that there is little mystery in mystery for me.

However, I find mysteries do make great summer reading. By “summer reading” in this case, I mean the generally accepted definition that you’re not made to work too hard to appreciate the works in question. I would consider Gravity’s Rainbow—an otherwise excellent book—crappy summer reading. You shouldn’t have to turn your brain completely off, but you also shouldn’t have to have a dictionary and other reference books close at hand—additional sources being difficult to manage in a fold-up lounge chair.

So, my personal list of great summer reads from the mystery genre would include anything by John Dunning (my biases being obvious in this case); anything by Jonathan Gash; and anything by Carl Hiaasen—although I have to admit that, although I love Hiaasen’s books when I’m reading them, I later find it difficult to separate them: “was that the one with guy who juggles skulls or the guy who lives above deadly barracudas?” What unites these choices is the clever conceits behind what makes a “detective” in a whodunit. In the works of all three authors, the protagonist is rarely a detective of any kind—or even a reliable person at all. These books are all squarely in the mystery genre, but they have playful elements of revisionism that attract my attention.

The “summer read” I specifically want to recommend though is Louis Bayard’s magnificent The Pale Blue Eye. This is a book I devoured in a few sittings with a scotch on the side-table and some Baroque on the stereo—at peace with the world—a perfect summer read. It is the most generic of the mysteries I’m recommending here in terms of it having an actual detective as a protagonist who is called upon to solve a murder; yet it is also the most challenging and rewarding. Bayard’s brilliant conceit is to set the murder at Westpoint during Edgar Allan Poe’s time at that venerable institution; and to make Poe a student liaison, friend and confidant of the detective narrator. Bayard’s talents shine during the sections of the novel that are in the form of correspondence written by Poe himself—a gutsy move that Bayard executes exquisitely. Bayard has crafted a traditional whodunit mystery (ho hum), within the historical fiction sub-genre of mysteries (yawn) and included large chunks of epistolary passages (aggressive yawn). To my usual tastes, this would be a three-strike deal breaker. Instead, Bayard has crafted a mystery that is genuinely gripping with a shocking ending; brought late 19th Century Westpoint to vivid life; and written utterly convincingly as a young Poe.

The Pale Blue Eye is thrilling, melancholy and shot through with black humour—a good read at any time—but a great summer read in that it is as intellectually rewarding as it is wildly entertaining. That’s what I want from a so-called summer read.

Any other suggestions out there?

“I’ll beat my head against that wall.”

Einstein on the Beach

One of the three weirdly disparate books I’m reading right now is The Rest is Noise by the gifted music critic of The New Yorker, Alex Ross.

I’ve recently dipped a toe into the world of 20th Century classical music through a smattering of Philip Glass and a wonderful collection of works by the underrated (I’ll get back to this) John Adams.

I don’t listen to much classical music overall. I have a great recording of Mozart’s Requiem, some Satie and a collection of Baroque pieces and that’s about it. My tastes tend to run to rock (The Clash to Muse) or Jazz (Vince Guaraldi to Miles Davis’s fusion experiments—oh, and Alice Coltrane over John—just listen to “Journey in Satchidananda” and you’ll see why). Classical has been largely impenetrable and frankly boring to me most of my life.

But I heard some Mahler inspired work by Nikolai Korndorf on the radio not long ago and it blew my hair back: big washes of impressionistic sound and repetitive tinkling filigree…vocalizations by some kind of choir…madness. I had to look up words like “atonal” to try and understand this thing I was hearing.

Mr. Ross’ The Rest is Noise is the perfect book for people like me. It combines an easily understood critical appreciation with fascinating historical and biographical context. I’m finding it an excellent introduction to a world of music I know little about. It never gets heavy-handed or didactic. What comes through Ross’ writing throughout is a genuine and contagious enthusiasm for his subject.

Which leads me back to John Adams being “underappreciated”: I had a chat recently with a friend about Glass, Adams and the marginalization of 20th Century classical music. We’re struck sometimes that so many people we encounter day-to-day have never heard of Adams or Glass and could care less (Glass maybe a little less so due to his soundtrack work).

Okay, so, Stravinsky was a rockstar and Adams toils away in obscurity because popular tastes have moved on. I get that. Fine. But to me Adams is an important figure. I think the arts still need to matter somehow—a quaint notion I know—and the indifference of even intelligent people to these artists is a little chilling to me.

Especially when, as Ross captures magnificently, all the arts are connected: in music, you can trace a line from Indonesian Gamelan through Mahler through Philip Glass to William Orbit and his work for Madonna. The more marginalized so-called high art becomes, the less substance is available to influence so-called low art. In other words, if we keep ignoring the good stuff, pop will, indeed, eventually eat itself.